Today I'm writing an
everydayST post on shopping. I'm an avid bargain-hunter. It deeply pains me to have to buy something at full price. I derive an inordinate amount of satisfaction for getting crazy deals. Early on in graduate school, friends critiqued how much time I spent clipping coupons and reading weekly ads and going to different stores to save money.
This entry is part of our [`everydayST`](http://stdaily.ghost.io/whats-the-everyday-dsrp-tag/) series. Learn more about the [`everydayST`](http://stdaily.ghost.io/whats-the-everyday-dsrp-tag/) tag.
There was a period of time when drugstores in my area were offering things "free after rebate," and I would buy the item using a coupon that was greater than the amount of tax charged and thereby make money on my purchases! Did I need that extra shampoo or toothbrush given my stockpile (bargain hunters often have a stockpile I find)? No, I didn't, but I bought it anyway and donated my loot to homeless shelters.
However, becoming cognizant over time of some downsides to my consumption patterns, I had to give some serious thought to my habits. I had to make
distinctions about the
perspectives underlying my behaviors. Instead of focusing on my identified
perspectives, I looked at the unidentified "other" (i.e., I used the thing/idea-other elements of
distinctions to think about
perspectives other than than the ones I consciously held). These included:
- My time is not a resource that must be entered into a calculation of the utility of bargain hunting.
- Anything that is free increases my net well-being.
- Mileage (gas) spent on shopping need not be calculated into the cost of goods.
This exercise in
distinctions was helpful. Beyond that, I realized over time I was contradicting other
perspectives I held (or increasingly came to hold as I lived in Seattle and settled into the long slog of grad school):
- Excess packaging is undesirable and bad for the environment.
- If I buy a free-after-rebate air freshener I would not have otherwise purchased, I'm filling my home with chemicals and ultimately creating some trash for a landfill.
- My time is precious!
- I could free up some of my bargain-hunting OCD to apply toward dissertation research!
This was not all about perspectives, I was also making
distinctions about my "higher" or at least longer-term interests. I had to give some thought to my
systems of belief, including their constituent parts, and whether in pursuing some interests (e.g., cheap) I neglected others (e.g., "eco-friendly").
That said, I'm still a bargainista. I love articles like this 2014 one in the Boston Globe on the trend toward downsizing product packaging. I'm impressed by how clever companies are at providing less without us knowing: sometimes the package even looks larger by some design changes when it contains less product! This is a devilish tactic used by companies to manipulate consumers and is actually a reorganization of
part-whole. It is also the reason why many stores, at the behest of customers, now provide unit pricing--or pricing based on the unit rather than the total price of the product.
I'm keen on making
distinctions between unit prices and have a sharp memory for
relating prices across grocery stores. This has helped me realize that the same grocery chain charges different prices depending on location (often seemingly to the detriment of people without a lot of shopping options). I also make
distinctions in the realm of packaging, and elect when possible to buy bulk or products that are otherwise minimally packaged (another product-side repackaging based on
In general, I have come to view my consumption patterns as a
system composed of many
parts (enjoyment, necessity, habit, values) that I need to continuously examine. A lot of my work is in teasing out the
relationships between the elements in the
system. If I buy based on my values
parts of which include organic, local, fair-wage-paying shops), that is not always going to correlate positively with my enjoyment of getting a great deal. (Sometimes, as with buying whole foods from bins, it does.)